On Tue, Jul 05, 2005 at 08:06:41AM +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Andre Poenitz wrote: > > At least a fat 'HACK' would be in order. Maybe even a debug message. > > > > For a proper solution we'd need something more general handling > > uncached metrics data. > > But isn't the check needed anyway? At least it can not harm, even if we fix > the cache problems (which we should).
Not sure. I think operations putting the cursor into the dark (like spellchecking into a closed, uncached insets) should switch on the light, and we should not bother in all other places whether the light is on. I.e. 'dispatch()' should be able to rely on a warm metrics cache. A simple work-around would be to compute the metrics also for closed insets. Some scaling of these values might even lead to a proper solution. Andre'
