Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > Angus> The allowable length of "mangled_file_name" below is dependent > Angus> on the (unmangled) path to the directory that is to contain > Angus> this file: > > Jean-Marc> Can you pass this directory to the function too? > > ... which is what you did in the following :) > > So my second proposal still stands. We do not need ridiculously long > names.
Or more than 640kB of memory. In true English football tradition, I'll go route-one. -- Angus
