On Tue, 2005-09-06 at 09:45 +0200, Juergen Spitzmueller wrote: > Martin Vermeer wrote: > > I may be missing something, but wouldn't it be simpler to just > > empty/invalidate the tabular paste buffer whenever the text paste buffer > > is being filled by a cut/copy (and thus becomes fresher)? That way you > > don't have to introduce an extra state tracking boolean. > > I thought about this too. But then cutandpaste has to have access to > insettabular, which I don't found a good idea.
This explanation crossed my mind too, but can it be true? You only need access to paste_tabular, which is a pointer. And isn't it global anyway? You have only one tabular paste buffer for all of LyX. What about moving this over to CutAndPaste? Wondering. - Martin
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
