>>>>> "Juergen" == Juergen Spitzmueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Juergen> Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: That does not particularly Juergen> disqualify my approach, no? >> Did I write that? Juergen> I just wanted to make clear that I got you right. Seems that Juergen> misunderstandings scale very well ;-) :) Juergen> I tried to move the setCursor call in front of the loop, but Juergen> that leads to cursor misdrawings in the insets, so setCursor Juergen> _has_ to be called afterwards. Juergen> Now I have put a call before the loop and left the one behind Juergen> (see attached patch). Does that make sense to you? It does not really make more sense than what we have, IMO. I propose to leave this code alone (I have no evidence that it is actually broken), apply the autoopen patch and revert andre's patch. JMarc
