On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:05:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> Can't you simply put the new stuff in a separate function? I > Andre> always have a feeling that additional bool parameters do not > Andre> improve readability, especially when the function in question > Andre> basically looks like > > Andre> void foo(bool b) { if (b) do_something(); else > Andre> do_something_else(); > Andre> } > > Not really, because it is only in macroMathClose that I have access to > the object that has been created there. How would I access the newly > built \frac{}{} object otherwise?
prevAtom(). Or maybe nextAtom(). Should be near the cursor, shouldn't it? > However Martin said that the patch makes errors when loading the > userguide. I'll have to check that. That's bad indeed. > I am seriously thinking about undoing my earlier patch (which leads to > crashes) and keeping the bug open for now. Hm. Andre'