On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 06:05:09PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote:
> >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> Andre> Can't you simply put the new stuff in a separate function? I
> Andre> always have a feeling that additional bool parameters do not
> Andre> improve readability, especially when the function in question
> Andre> basically looks like
> 
> Andre> void foo(bool b) { if (b) do_something(); else
> Andre> do_something_else();
> Andre> }
> 
> Not really, because it is only in macroMathClose that I have access to
> the object that has been created there. How would I access the newly
> built \frac{}{} object otherwise?

prevAtom(). Or maybe nextAtom(). Should be near the cursor, shouldn't
it?

> However Martin said that the patch makes errors when loading the
> userguide. I'll have to check that.

That's bad indeed.

> I am seriously thinking about undoing my earlier patch (which leads to
> crashes) and keeping the bug open for now.

Hm.

Andre'

Reply via email to