On Mon, Jan 16, 2006 at 11:21:19AM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Martin Vermeer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:09:04AM +0100, Michael Gerz wrote: > | > Michael Gerz wrote: > | > > | > >>| And the best news is that you can still change the background color > | > >>| (though I don't know why). > | > >>| | It seem like we are loosing no functionality with this patch but > | > >>gain > | > >>| the hearts of a lot of Windows users :-) > | > >>| | Please, put this into 1.4.0... > | > >> > | > >>You have of course tested this on linux as well. Not just windows. > | > > > | > >Of course, I did!!! :-) And Martin did as well IIRC. > | > > > | > >Michael > | > > | > Ping... > | > | Pong... > > I am still a bit afraid there might be gotchas...
Is there any realistic way of finding out? I am having this patch in my local tree (Linux) and it seems to work OK. I share your dark suspicions though... should we just surround the patch with Windows conditionals? Minimizes any damage. - Martin
pgpeOw89sIFMF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
