[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
| On 28 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
|
| > Jean-Marc Lasgouttes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | >>>>> "Georg" == Georg Baum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > |
| > | Georg> Am Samstag, 28. Januar 2006 09:55 schrieb Abdelrazak Younes:
| > | >> Let's put it this way: My priority is to have something in CVS (or
| > | >> SVN) so that others could help me (I am kind of stalled now). So,
| > | >> if the 1.5.0 branch is created before the 1.4.3 one I would prefer
| > | >> to go with 1.5. Then, if someone (maybe me) feels like down port
| > | >> the frontend to 1.4.x, so be it.
| > |
| > | Georg> That is very sensible. And if we switch to subversion before
| > | Georg> adding your qt4 frontend we could even copy the qt2 frontend to
| > | Georg> qt4 and then apply your changes. That way we don't loose
| > | Georg> history.
| > |
| > | I think we should put the qt4 frontend in svn before branching for
| > | 1.4. We even do that without actually distributing the code.
| >
| > Note that with subversion (yes, I have my scripts ready and warmed up
| > for conversion)
|
| For when is the switch to subversion planned?
After the release :-)
| Speaking of the release of 1.4, is there anything that needs to be done on
| the wiki in relation to this release?
No, not that I know of.
But I'd like you to think about trac as well.
To me it is a system that is quite simple and gives us viewcvs,
bugzilla and wiki functionality in one easy to maintain and administer
package. So I'd like comments on that from everybody.
--
Lgb
