On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> | On 29 Jan 2006, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> |
> | > But I'd like you to think about trac as well. To me it is a system that
> | > is quite simple and gives us viewcvs, bugzilla and wiki functionality in
> | > one easy to maintain and administer package. So I'd like comments on
> | > that from everybody.
> |
> | Are you thinking about trac for developers as well as for regular users?
>
> well... yes.
>
> | Are you thinking of any specific drawbacks with viewcvs and bugzilla,
> | which is why you'd like them replaced? Or is it the integration that is
> | the bonus here?
>
> The integration is a bonus, as is the rpm packaging.
> Being close to unable to upgrade bugzilla bothers me.
Can Trac import bugzilla information? (I'm guessing that's an important
criterion)
> Trac has a nice upgrade path.
Ok, I definitely see the advantage of that. One thing I like about PmWiki
is that I use subversion to upgrade it...
/Christian
PS. There is an issue tracking system in PmWiki that is used for tracking
it's bugs. It's quite easy to use from a users point of view, not sure if
that's interesting:
http://www.pmwiki.org/wiki/PITS/PITS
I sure doesn't have all the bells and whistles of bugzilla though.
--
Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
