On Thu, 16 Feb 2006, John Levon wrote: > On Thu, Feb 16, 2006 at 10:55:58PM +0100, Abdelrazak Younes wrote: > > > On one hand, IMHO, if released now, 1.4.0 wouldn't bring that much to > > the final user compared to 1.3.7 and it is much slower. As a user I will > > stick with 1.3.7. > > It's worth remembering that one of the reasons that 1.4.0 is so much > slower is because the code was treated like a wiki.
Hey, can you guys leave the wiki alone! It doesn't want to be involved in this discussion ... ;-) ... > It'd be much nicer if we had better review tools, I agree. It's been a while, but for plain comparing of files I liked to use tkdiff. Aren't there better tools available today? What is it that is needed here, is it something that takes the patch, applies to a temporary copy of the correct source file and then compares them? Maybe there's an Emacs mode for this? /Christian -- Christian Ridderström, +46-8-768 39 44 http://www.md.kth.se/~chr
