On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 08:53:34PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > Michael Gerz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote: > | > | >Developer, if you have _anyting_ that you feel _must_ be included in > | >1.4.0, the time is to state so now, loud and clear. > | > > | All the change tracking stuff should go in. It can't get worse. > > Which part of the CT feature is not working?
Michael means the multi-paragraph part. > Is it usable at all? For some people apparently it is, which I find a bit surprising. > Does it kill your documents? > Reboot your box? > > It can get a lot worse... Yes, a bad patch can break a lot more than just what it tries to fix. Same for the fix to "skip first change" (2212 IIRC). On the surface it is a cosmetic patch, but it makes some deep changes. So forget it at this point. IMHO of course. BTW what about creating a feature branch for CT directly under the branches/ root? Makes playing around a little easier for people. - Martin
pgpcunbf8B3Kc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
