On Thu, Mar 16, 2006 at 02:49:11PM +0100, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 
> | Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | > Lars Gullik Bjønnes a écrit :
> | > > btw. did we come to any consensus about my "Drop ChangeLogs" RFC?
> | 
> | > I guess unless someone decide there would be no decision.
> | > So?
> | 
> | I don't hear anybody speaking up for ChangeLogs.
> 
> You have not listend well enough.
> 
> Not speaking for ChangeLogs as such, but the information it gives.
> And I agree; unless committers can show that they are able to put the
> same (relevant) information in commit messages a deprecation of
> ChangeLogs is moot.

It's especially the function names that are useful, now that file names
can be easily changed. 

Is there a way to automate the commit message editing process in such a
way that the user can easily add this info to the list of files? I.e.,
the guard protecting the file list should be removed and some smaller
format conversions to make it changelog-like. I googled for scripts
doing that, but nothing really right turned up.

- Martin

Attachment: pgpWUdlxZagHr.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to