Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 01:20:48AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > "Bo Peng" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > Could you please post a use case or two where you think exceptions
| > | > will improve LyX significantly?
| > |
| > | When I get my hands dirty with output_latex, paragraphlist, cursor
| > | etc, lyx will simply crash for a misuse of function, and leave me no
| > | clue what goes wrong. I would vote for much more assert and throw in
| > | the code. Attached is something I use in my own project:
| >
| > You need a good reason to not be able to go with BOOST_ASSERT
|
| A hard crash is nothing I can sell _my_ customers. Under no
| circumstances. The best thing is to have a message box and
| let the user decide to let two weeks worth of simulation die
| or give him a chance to make sense of the data collected so far.
Note that we can make BOOST_ASSERT throw if we want it to.
--
Lgb
