Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 11:35:22AM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| >
| > | > (I do not really like svn+ssh but to be it is the only realistic
| > | > alternative. I hope the subversion people will get their act together
| > | > soon and provide some ssl/sasl authentication methods soon)
| > |
| > | Wouldn't https work?
| >
| > :-) no.
| >
| > I do not count that as a realistic alternative.
|
| I am seriously curious: Why?
Letf over from work really. The interrupt semantics (interrupt a run
svn) of svn:// and http:// is completely different.
And also that there is a several more components that has to work
together (, and I already had/have the ssh stuff setup).
| We do use that at work (mainly because of the possible LDAP
| authorization)
If we used LDAP... then perhaps.
--
Lgb
