Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > So this noexport means "no export from lyx format", right?
Yes. > Wouldn't it be better (with a similar patch) to tag the formats that > are relevant to the whole document and formats that are relevant to > objects? I would only tag the formats that are relevant to the whole document, since we currently don't need to know whether a format is an object format or not. It would be confusing for users to have a setting that does not have any effect. The new flag would basically be the negated "noexport". Do you have a good name? I can think of "document", but I don't know if it is clear enough. > It seems to me that the problem is that the two graphs of > converters overlap and this is what causes the problem. Am I right? Yes. > The effect would be the same, the the noexport flag looks a bit ad-hoc > to me. > > Also, what would the plan be for 1.4? Would there be a plan at all?. So far there is no plan at all. It could also be used for 1.4 with the only difference that I would not remove the 1.3 compatibility code for viewers. Georg
