Andre Poenitz a écrit :
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 09:49:01AM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
Andre Poenitz a écrit :
Not in my vi. The previous lines uses a tab for indentation
(as they should) and the 'insertColums' line uses four spaces.
Believe it or not, that _is_ a difference.
Two people told me so already, I think I undesrtand with this third
iteration ;-)
Me too but I was worried that a section with the same text could get
replaced. The last version in svn do not take str anyway... but still
make use of make_pair.
The two versions are semantically equivalent. In fact, operator[] is
just syntactic sugar. But it helps...
Yep.
What is not the best approach?
Storing QModelIndex over 'a long period of time'.
Qt dcumentation is pretty vague in this area, and I had crashs which
went away after chosing something more robust.
If you are sure that your way is safe, fine. I just wanted to warn...
Sure thanks. What I found is that the QModelIndex inside a SelectonModel
are not stable at all. But QModelIndex inside an AbstractItemModel are
stable.
Abdel.
