On Fri, Apr 28, 2006 at 09:49:26AM +0200, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes wrote: > >>>>> "Andre" == Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Andre> I would think that instead of immediate updates, some > Andre> 'invalidation' could happen that could be accumulated until a > Andre> real 'update' is needed. > > Andre> This way, any function changing e.g. a paragraph's contents > Andre> could 'invalidate the paragraph' and we do not have to second > Andre> guess what exactly happened in the dipatch(). > > This makes much sense indeed. We could invalidate single rows too.
Sure. And thinks 'cursor moved', or even 'cursor moved, but not vertically'. Andre'
