On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 02:52:49PM +0200, Enrico Forestieri wrote:
> I don't think so, as it is a very particular switch. Here is the
> pertinent comment in src/lyxfunc.C:
>
> void actOnUpdatedPrefs(LyXRC const & lyxrc_orig, LyXRC const & lyxrc_new)
> {
> // Why the switch you might ask. It is a trick to ensure that all
> // the elements in the LyXRCTags enum is handled. As you can see
> // there are no breaks at all. So it is just a huge fall-through.
> // The nice thing is that we will get a warning from the compiler
> // if we forget an element.
Ok then. I did not had the full context.
Andre'
