>>>>> "Angus" == Angus Leeming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Angus> Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Following my config.h analysis, this patch gets rid of <config.h> >> I am ready to do more of this but I would like to know first if >> this kind of patch will be accepted. Angus> The last time we thought about this, we decided that config.h Angus> should be #included in *all* .C file and *no* .h files. All .C Angus> files should have the same build environment and that's Angus> guaranteed by using config.h. Yes. I am absolutely against removing config.h from .C file especially if the only lame reason you have is that it does not sit well with your plan to switch to scons :) I have fixed a few monthes ago link errors in Mac OS X which came from the fact that some templates where used with config.h loaded in some cases, and without it in other cases. In some cases, loading config.h does change the type of variables. JMarc
