On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 09:35:23AM +0200, Peter Kümmel wrote: > Here numbers from Windows/Linux, > scrolling the Guide, in sec: > > Qt4.1.3, release, > Linux no anti-al.: 19 > Linux with anti-al.: 25 > Windows 2k : 30 > > LyX 1.3.6, Qt 3.3.4 > Linux no anti-al.: 6-7 > Linux with anti-al.: 6-7 > > > Is 1.5 so slow only because of Qt > or are there also changes of LyX > responsible for?
There are also LyX changes that might contibute to the bad performance. > -Modules, 42.530127 > -QtGui4.dll (SymExport), 18.157461 > QPainter::drawTextItem, 3.968417 > QPainter::drawPixmap, 1.599013 > QPainter::drawRects, 1.450104 > QPainter::begin, 1.413113 > QPainter::QPainter, 0.828970 > QBrush::init, 0.537057 > QBrush::cleanUp, 0.520920 > QPainter::~QPainter, 0.421153 > QPainter::drawText, 0.395810 > QTextEngine::itemize, 0.377406 > QTextEngine::shapeText, 0.308763 > QFontMetrics::~QFontMetrics, 0.288641 > QFontDatabase::load, 0.225289 > QPen::operator=, 0.221603 > QPen::QPen, 0.200135 > [....] Do you have any caller tree information? Andre'
