Abdel> That's what I thought also but Angus Abdel> explained me that gcc C++ ABI is Abdel> compatible with microsoft if you use static Abdel> linking. It's Gcc dll handling that is non Abdel> compatible with MSVC.
Did I really say that? I have absolutely no evidence one way or the other to back that up. What I do understand to be true is that .dlls compiled by gcc (note, gcc, not g++) should be able to be read by MSVC compiled code but can't because they mess up the entry point to the .dll. (As I understand it, that's the rdata fix that Enrico has posted and which I also understand is in the scons files.) As for the C++ ABI-thingie: I re-iterate, I have no idea one way or the other. Ask on the MinGW list perhaps? Angus PS. Note that I'm prefacing all these statements with "as I understand it". Caveat emptor...
