Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 05:48:29PM +0200, Abdelrazak Younes wrote:
| > By the way, this is written nowhere and I had the impression that
| > "gui_instance_" style was the rule in the current code. Could you
| > confirm that please because I used the "gui_instance_" style everywhere
| > already :-(
|
| I think camelBump_ style for data members is a recent addition to the
| LyX style zoo.
No, not really...
| I would think that most core code has underline_style_ data members.
|
| There are about
|
| 235 occurences of onlylowercase_
| 32 occurences of lower_case_
| 15 occurences of lowerCamelBump_
| 4 occurences of UpperCamelBump_
|
| in src/*.h.
|
| So according to the 'Do what is done in src/*' rule lowerCamelBump_
| is not the prefered style.
Short descriptive names is the prefered style.
And as said we (as in I perhaps) have been confused with stl/boost
style.
But our documented style has been fooBarZarg
--
Lgb
