Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| On Mon, Jun 19, 2006 at 06:29:14PM +0200, Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Then it is misleading. We use the same naming scheme for member
| > functions and member variables.
|
| 'We' as in the old days?
'We' as we have documented it.
| Could well be, but that does not mean that the other n-1 do.
|
| > | Really if you look at current source code it is mostly this style:
| > |
| > | class ThisIsOneClass
| > | {
| > | void thisIsOneMethod(OneType one_type);
| > |
| > | OneType one_type_;
| > | }
| >
| > Eh.. no. you have to look at more code.
|
| In src/*?
|
| I wait for your counting.
|
| I posted the result of mine.
Are you saying that 30 vs 15 is conclusive?
--
Lgb
