Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
| > | > Andre Poenitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > | > | We have abondoned Coding_Rules(?) a long time ago and used 'do
| > | > whatever
| > | > | the majority in src/* does'
| > | > No.
| > | | Is that an answer to a question, an imperative an definitive
| > "No" or
| > | just your opinion?
| > "No" we have not abondende the rules, we are just not abiding by
| > them.
| > | I think that changing the source code to respect the coding rule is
| > | more work than the other way around.
| > Oh I agree.
|
| Please clarify... Are you saying that you agree that we should modify
| the code rules to use "this_is_a_private_member_" style?
No. I am saying that we should change the code rules when we see a
need. That might be allowing "this_is_a_variable", but that has not
really ben discussed yet.
|
| > But that does not mean that theere should be no changes to the code.
|
| Of course not.
|
| Abdel.
|
|
--
Lgb
