Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
> Peter Kümmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> | Reflecting:
> |
> | So much trouble because of ICONV_CONST.
> |
> | We should have used my initial solution:
> |
> | template<class T>
> | struct optional_p2p_const_cast
> | {
> | optional_p2p_const_cast(T const ** p2p) : t_p2p(p2p) {}
> | operator T const **() { return t_p2p; }
> | operator T **() { return const_cast<T **>(t_p2p); }
> | T const ** t_p2p;
> | };
> |
> | Why have we chosen the long way? Changing three build systems
> | producing more than 40 mails, wasting the time several developers.
>
> Who cares about the buildsystems?
>
I care about my free time.
> We have changed _one_ line in the code.
> And that is far more important.
>
