Lars Gullik Bjønnes wrote:
Abdelrazak Younes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Andre Poenitz wrote:
| > On Tue, Aug 15, 2006 at 11:06:16PM +0200, Michael Gerz wrote:
| >> Abdel,
| >>
| >>>> I don't know the status regarding (1) - is there anything
| >>>> missing? Are there any changes to qt3 that haven't been ported to
| >>>> qt4?
| >>> I think qt4 has now the same feature set as qt3 plus some more candy:
| >>> And qt4 has a much nicer code base now, most notably for:
| >> How about
| >> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg96610.html
| >> ?
| >>
| >>> Conclusion: this is not a valid objection. Besides Peter is
| >>> committed to get rid of those compat methods.
| >> Then let's convince Lars that this is not a showstopper :-)
| > Trolltech considers the QT3 compat stuff as regular part of Qt4, i.e.
| > pretty much the same way the <cxxxx> headers are part of C++.
|
| Conclusion: We are even ready for Qt5 now :-)
And then it begins to sound silly.
If you don't explain why it sounds silly nobody except you will find it
silly...
