On Sun, Jul 30, 2017 at 10:06:13PM +0200, Stephan Witt wrote: > Am 30.07.2017 um 19:45 schrieb Uwe Stöhr <uwesto...@web.de>: > > > > El 29.07.2017 a las 23:47, Scott Kostyshak escribió: > > > >> Agreed. Hopefully we can get more in the future. > > > > As on no OS people are using 100% and as 120% was the reported the minimal > > used zoom level, I again vote to make the new 100% the current 120%. > > How do you want to achieve this? I’m not so confident it’s good to change the > current computation of screen zoom.
> Every preference saved to disk would be „invalid“ after a change. Couldn't we (in theory) fix it with prefs2prefs? > I’m not against a decision what the best default zoom level is. I agree that for 2.3.0 it would be better to consider changing the default zoom instead of changing what 100% means. I do find it a little strange that the default is not 100%, but not strange enough that I think we should spend time on it for 2.3.0. Scott
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
