On 12/7/25 2:21 AM, Pichler, Alois wrote:
For consistency (with VSCode, e.g.) it should be Alt+Left (and Alt+right).
The difficulty is that these are already bound. That could be changed,
but we try not to change the key bindings unless it's really necessary:
People are already used to them. I just checked, and at least in the
standard non-OSX file, everything involving Left and Right are bound.
What would make a lot of sense in LyX would be: Alt-> and Alt-<. We
already use Ctrl-> and Ctrl-< for goto-type actions.
Riki
Am Sa., 6. Dez. 2025 um 21:29 Uhr schrieb Richard Kimberly Heck
<[email protected]>:
On 12/6/25 2:59 PM, Scott Kostyshak wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 06, 2025 at 02:57:44PM +0100, Jean-Marc Lasgouttes
wrote:
>> Le 06/12/2025 à 14:53, Pichler, Alois a écrit :
>>> Dear LyX-development team,
>>>
>>> Emacs has: goto-last-change (and goto-last-change-reverse),
>>> VSCode has: navigateBackInEditLocations (and
navigateForwardInEditLocations)
>>> Vim has: previous change position jump, invoked with with g;
>>>
>>> Would be nice to have a similar functionality in LyX.
>>> Thank you all and Happy Advent!
>> Hello,
>>
>> This would not be that difficult, using the information in the
undo stack.
>>
>> The difficult point is the key binding ;)
>> A suggestion?
> I use g; all the time in Vim.
>
> In LyX I use the sequence ctrl + z, ctrl + y to try to
accomplish the same thing.
I've gotten so used to that.... In fact, you could just bind
"command-sequence undo; redo" to whatever you like. But it's probably
better to have a real LFUN.
Riki
--
----------------------------
Richard Kimberly (Riki) Heck
Professor of Philosophy and Professor of Linguistics
Brown University
Pronouns: they/them/their
Website:http://rkheck.frege.org/
--
lyx-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.lyx.org/mailman/listinfo/lyx-users
