Baruch Even wrote:
> * Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010717 18:47]:
>
> > Great. Since you are a lyx developper, I think we can safely
> > that your advice and continue to build using 0.89.
>
> I am one of the developers but this is my impression and the fact that I
> do not know of any report of problem with 0.89, but I guess any other
> developer will also say the same.
Nobody has objected so far! :-)
> > I'd very appreciate it if you could edit the README and INSTALL
> > files in CVS so this is made clearer. (It would be nicer still
> > if a few words were found on the Lyx web site, but that may be
> > beyond your control. Should I file a wislist bug at SF?)
>
> File one anyway so it will be kept there in case it falls to the
> wayside. John is our BTS supervisor, he is the one who keeps us in sync
> with the BTS and reminds us to do our tasks.
Done. SF bug #442124. Thanks!
Peter
