On Wed, Apr 10, 2002 at 11:43:23PM +0300, Robin Turner wrote: > > I'd say perl, given the massive user base and the wide availability of > existing modules. OK, it's not the most aesthetic language around (generally > looks like a spider's been tap-dancing on my punctuation keys) but it's > familiar and well-suited to operations on text.
Why not just a generic way of including shared objects, independent of what language? Or is perl not able to produce shared objects? Seems to me most self-respecting languages can produce .so's.. Regards, Koen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Koen Martens) http://www.metro.cx/
