On Mon, Oct 07, 2002 at 05:39:30PM +0200, Herbert Voss wrote: > I do not agree! You have most of the amsstuff in lib/symbols, f.ex. > ... > hexagon wasy 55 0 x x
Nevertheless it breaks if a user does not want AMS but uses a "hexagon" macro of his own. In this case LyX decides to use AMS and the user has no way to switch it off. Actually I really have better things to do than to have this argument again. Nothing - really NOTHING as far as I am concerned - is going to change in this area until 1.3 is out. So if anybody want to have a discussion again please talk to /dev/null or tell me to unsubscribe (again) from the list. > it is no problem to add another (optional) column > where you define a package to which the symbol or > command depends. It is not only amsmath which is > irritating to new users, wasysym f.ex. too. Yes, that would be a good idea if we want to stick to the guessing mechanism. Andre' -- Those who desire to give up Freedom in order to gain Security, will not have, nor do they deserve, either one. (T. Jefferson)
