Vladimir Prus wrote: >> Something like this exists in the 1.4.x cvs (too buggy for real use >> ATM). > > And which approach is used?
Alfredo Braunstein implemented a regex search and replace if memory serves me well. > Also, is 1.4 considered stable enough to be > worth using by regular users? No. The trouble is that those responsible for the total rewriting of how lyx iterators work have either: * started a new job and has only minimal time for lyx ATM, or * just finished a PhD and is revising for his viva. Of the other core developers, none are devoting very much time to lyx ATM, AFAICT. -- Angus