Vladimir Prus wrote:
>> Something like this exists in the 1.4.x cvs (too buggy for real use
>> ATM).
> 
> And which approach is used?

Alfredo Braunstein implemented a regex search and replace if memory serves
me well.

> Also, is 1.4 considered stable enough to be
> worth using by regular users?

No. The trouble is that those responsible for the total rewriting of how
lyx iterators work have either:
* started a new job and has only minimal time for lyx ATM, or
* just finished a PhD and is revising for his viva.

Of the other core developers, none are devoting very much time to lyx ATM,
AFAICT.

-- 
Angus

Reply via email to