Hi, Thanks for your reply.
tir, 22 02 2005 kl. 16:54 +0100, skrev Uwe StÃhr: > Rasmus Ory Nielsen wrote: > > > I think that the size of the typewriter font used in urls is too large. > > The used font depends on the font choosed in Layout -> Document. You can > also set another font in the preamble. > But what are you mean with "too large"? Typewriter is monospaced, so > that every letter has the same width. I have attached two files, a postscript export and a pdflatex export. The postscript export has the typewriter font only a bit too large (looks similar in gv, ggv and gsview). And, as I wrote, the pdflatex export looks fine (like yours) in acrobat, but other viewers have very different opinions. > > > And even more strange: the size of the typewriter font depends on how I > > produce the output: With "View postscript" the font is a bit too large. > > With "View pdf (pdflatex)" the output is perfect (using acrobat). But if > > I view the same pdf file in another viewer like gv, xpdf, or gsview the > > font is either a bit too large or so big (wide) that it collapses with > > the following text. > > Astonishing, I have no such problems. The attached pdf looks nice in > acrobat and gsview. Also the postscript output looks OK. I use pdflatex > 1.21a. And your pdf looks perfect in all my viewers. Any ideas on what is going on? I am using fc3 with a plain tetex installation. Ahh, I think I have found the answer myself, it is a problem in the urw- fonts rpm package in fc3: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/beta/show_bug.cgi?id=140584 Downgrading the urw-fonts package while writing.. Yeah, downgrading to urw-fonts-2.1-7.noarch.rpm solved the problem! Best regards Rasmus Ory Nielsen
newfile1.ps
Description: PostScript document
newfile1.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
