On Friday 17 June 2005 21:07, Andre Poenitz wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2005 at 11:20:05AM +0100, Angus Leeming wrote:
> > Wolfgang Engelmann wrote:
> > > Do I understand you correctly, that I should use at least under
> > > SuSe 9.2 (and 9.3?) LyX xforms instead of QT? Or switch to
> > > another distribution?
> >
> > Nope. It's sufficient to follow Georg's suggestion of invoking
> > lyx through a wrapper script
> >
> > #! /bin/sh
> > LANG=de_DE lyx $*
>
> What happened to "$@"?

Bah! sh, cmd.exe, they're the same, right?

Angus (easily confused)

Reply via email to