Dear All, Ingar>> As a translator I have to say that the number of toolkits Ingar>> increase the amount of work for the translators as well. Ingar>> Different toolsets have different ways to specify shortcuts and Ingar>> each have to be translated manually.
JML> Note we could make an effort to change this: use the &shortcut JML> notation everywhere and avoid gratuitous differences between JML> frontends. Is it possible to create a translation code internally, to handle the differences in GUIs? I have (almost) finshed the translation of Qt strings. It would be useful, If I could reuse all of them, without doublecating thoose strings. Now, I have to copy/paste, change shortcut, verify, etc. We could make it simplier, by making a string convertion for every GUI. -- Alex mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
