On Thu, 16 Nov 2006 08:00:49 +0100 (MET) Jean-Pierre Chretien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It might come from two tetex subpackages not being in sync. > Upgrade is advisable before reporting I guess. Well, debian's package descriptions don't explicitly list which versions of babel and amsart are used, but as far as I could see the difference between the "testing" version which I have been using, and the "unstable" version, which is newer, is only a minor-number version change. > > You might install texlive if the problem remains. The texlive packaging has > been reviewed before it entered Debian/etch in june, and texlive|tetex > have been made equivalent in LyX dependencies. Just installed it. This replaces the tetex distribution. texlive definitely fixes the problem, and it is also a screamingly fast-compiling tex. Very nice. Thanks for the suggestion. This beats trying to upgrade just a piece of the tex distribution by snagging archives from CTAN, which for all I know would screw something else up. -- David L. Johnson __o | And what if you track down these men and kill them, what if you _`\(,_ | killed all of us? From every corner of Europe, hundreds, (_)/ (_) | thousands would rise up to take our places. Even Nazis can't kill that fast. -- Paul Henreid (Casablanca).