2008/12/17 Piero Faustini <pierofaust...@hotmail.com>: > > Hello, I used Lyx 1.6.0 with Biblatex in a italian document. > In order to mantain a lot of different languages encodings in my > bibliography, I used to save my .bib file with a UTF encoding, and then in > the Language options of Lyx, select a UTF extended encoding for my Document. > I can't remember why I didn't choose other encodings, anyway, in this manner > everything worked perfect. TILL I started to use LyX 1.6.1: now it seems that > LyX can't read anything in the UTF .bib file (so the references dialogue > doesn't show anything) although BibLaTeX can read everything fine and > produces a perfect output. The problem is editing: now I can't select my > references! > The trick I'm using is have 2 identical .bib files in different encodings, > one, in a simple encoding, indicated in LyX bibliography (which is by purpose > put in a note in order to let BibLaTeX do all the job), the other, in UTF, in > the preamble's BibLaTeX code. > But this is annoying: everytime I change my bibliography file I have to > produce 2 files! How to have back LyX 1.6.1 read a UTF .bib file??? > P.S. If you wonder what BibLaTeX is, nevermind - the question is: how to have > LyX read a UTF .bib file?
IMO such behaviour is somehow close to correct. LyX do not support BibLaTeX officially, so if it cannot handle UTF .bib files, it is compatible with BibTeX. I may not have right. -- Manveru jabber: manv...@manveru.pl gg: 1624001 http://www.manveru.pl