Am Montag, 11. Juni 2012 um 11:03:00, schrieb Scott Kostyshak <skost...@princeton.edu> > From: Kornel Benko [kornel.be...@berlin.de] > Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 6:19 AM > > >Confirmed for lyx 2.0.4svn, but not for lyx 2.1.0svn. > > > Does this mean that in 2.1.0svn the F is correctly underlined for you or that > you are just not confirming for 2.1.0svn? >
Sorry, it means
in 2.1.0svn ' ' before F *was* underlined,
in 2.0.4svn 'F' is underlined
In both cases the locale is the same, using kde-plasma desktop.
LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
LANGUAGE=de_DE:sk:en
LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_NUMERIC="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_TIME="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_COLLATE=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_MONETARY="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_MESSAGES=de_DE.UTF-8
LC_PAPER="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_NAME="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_ADDRESS="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_TELEPHONE="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_MEASUREMENT="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_IDENTIFICATION="de_DE.UTF-8"
LC_ALL=
This may not be important, me thinks.
The crazy thing now is: Without recompiling, now also in 2.1.0svn 'F' is
underlined.
I cannot see the bad behaviour anymore.
What I have done in the meantime? I played with configure of the unity-desktop
(with my login)
to be able to configure it correct later for my wife.
> Thanks,
>
>
> Scott
Kornel
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
