On Saturday 2013-06-08 18:34, Antonio Diaz Diaz wrote: > Xz deviates too much from the user interface of similar unix-like tools (not > only compressors). This already looks ugly when xz is used with zutils.
I recognize that xz is a little over-eager when displaying progress. Both gzip and bzip2 -v show a per-file result, and only when -vv is used does bzip2 shows a more fine-grained progress, and that is what I would like to see with lzip -vv. >> Also, plzip currently makes use of lzlib, but lzip(-1.14) does not. Are there >> plans to make lzip use the library as well? > > Why? Well, code reduction was my thought (since bzip2 uses libbz2 and xz uses liblzma5), but it turns out gzip does not use libz either, so my inquiry has been satisfactorily answered :) _______________________________________________ Lzip-bug mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lzip-bug
