Yeah, I think keep it on this list. Then it covers the REX part of REXCPM.
Philip
On 12/05/2020 3:52 pm, Stephen Adolph wrote:
After I wrote the note, I wondered if using the other list really made
sense; it would divide the discussions.
On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:57 PM David Rogers <wa7...@gmail.com
<mailto:wa7...@gmail.com>> wrote:
What Kevin said, except I just happen to still have the 100, 102,
200 and NEC units from the days when they were the latest thing.
But I used CP/M in those days and found it to be easy to use and
effective for the relative simplicity of the computers of the day.
CP/M over, e.g., WordPerfect any day. But I like one mailing list
to cover them all.
David
*/C’est la vie, c’est la guerre, viva la salade de pommes de terre./*
On May 11, 2020, at 7:49 PM, Kevin Becker <ke...@kevinbecker.org
<mailto:ke...@kevinbecker.org>> wrote:
I'd prefer one list for all M100 stuff but I suppose it doesn't
matter
much either way. I'm not likely to be much of a contributor but I'm
very interested in trying out CP/M and even bought a (okay several)
M100 just for this purpose.
On Mon, 2020-05-11 at 22:40 -0400, Stephen Adolph wrote:
Hi folks,
I have started to update the REX wiki for my new projects:
REXCPM
and
REX# aka REXsharp
a work in progress.....
Anyhow, we have a mailing list for CP/M use on Model 100 called
MTCPM. I wonder if we should revive that for CP/M discussions now,
or should we keep CP/M here on this list?
thoughts?
Steve
