Ahh, right.

And I suppose it's too big to save as a .DO and then save that off.

The other option is to "Print" it to a file if you are interested in trying that option. :) But again, you still end up with a text file, not a tokenized .BA file.

Ken

On 5/21/21 8:50 PM, Gary Weber wrote:
I can use the intrinsic Load & Save functions in the menu for .DO and .CO files, but I can't use the Load option for .BA files due to the dreaded "Ill formed BASIC file". (Lack of an NEC tokenizer, methinks.)

The Save to HD option does work for .BA files, but since I have to jump into TS-DOS in order to load a .BA properly, I'm just accustomed to using one interface (TS-DOS) for file operations just as a matter of practice.

Gary.

On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:56 PM Ken Pettit <petti...@gmail.com <mailto:petti...@gmail.com>> wrote:

    Of course I need to ask the question that hasn't been asked yet:

    Why go to all the trouble of trying to save off a file from
    VirtualT to the host using TS-DOS and the virtual NADSBox
    emulation?  Why not just use the "File -> Save to HD" menu option?

    Ken

    On 5/21/21 6:28 PM, Stephen Adolph wrote:
    I cant test this.  It is entirely internal.

    From what I read you have

    Virtual T NEC, with TSDOS
    Chatting with
    Virtual Nadsbox
    Using internal connection.

    If you could show that real NEC has this issue then I am all set
    to snoop it.
    You could use laddieAlpha as a client for example.



    On Friday, May 21, 2021, Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com
    <mailto:twospru...@gmail.com>> wrote:

        I think I just made a testbed for that.
        Happy to set up and capture traces

        On Friday, May 21, 2021, Gary Weber <g...@web8201.com
        <mailto:g...@web8201.com>> wrote:

            Yeah, that's interesting. Suppose we could "sniff"
            what TS-DOS is doing, as this is 100% repeatable.  In my
            case, every test I've done results in the file handle not
being closed, so it must never be sending the opcode. That just seems very weird to me, though.

            On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 4:39 PM John R. Hogerhuis
            <jho...@pobox.com <mailto:jho...@pobox.com>> wrote:

                Which would be a bug in TSDOS. Which either would
                have to be fixed there or we close the file after a
                timeout or some other TPDD command can be used as an
                indication the file is no longer being written. Like
                if the directory starts being enumerated.

                -- John.



Reply via email to