Seems like there are a lot of tough ones... Word wrap, relative position / simple windowing taking significant work.
M100 is simpler than vt100. So it seems trivial to map m100 escapes to vt100. But mapping vt100 back to m100 would only be easy for a subset of vt100 escapes. But that "might* still be useful depending on what bbs's tend to use. -- John. On Sun, Nov 26, 2023, 3:15 PM Stephen Adolph <twospru...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are a couple of hard ones John. > Didn't we go through them and conclude certain m100 sequences could not be > done on VT100? > Having said that I don't recall which ones for sure. > > > > On Sunday, November 26, 2023, John R. Hogerhuis <jho...@pobox.com> wrote: > >> How different is vt100 from the m100's native terminal emulation (mostly >> vt52). What's missing that you need... >> >> I could map necessary codes in HTERM. It already does a lot of >> processing to map utf8 characters and xterm escapes. In fact that's most of >> what HTERM does aside fromn hardware flow control. >> >> -- John. >> >>>
