I'm in favour of this - it was the intention of: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-221
If you'd like to add your examples to enhance that, that'd be great. I guess we should do this for alpha-2 so the mojo specification can be finalised. I'll schedule it. Cheers, Brett Emmanuel Venisse wrote: >Hi, > >Can we change the plugin parameter definition from class comment to field >comment for obtain a more readable source? > >Actually, we have : >/** > ... > * @parameter name="outputDirectory" > * type="String" > * required="true" > * validator="" > * expression="#project.build.outputDirectory" > * description="" > ... > */ > >Can we replace this by : > >/** > * Description is here like a javadoc comment > * @parameter > * alias="optional name that replace the field name" > * required="true" > * validator="" > * expression=="#project.build.outputDirectory" > */ > String outputDirectory="aDefaultValue"; > >=> the type isn't an attribute of parameter but the type of field > >I'm not sure if it's possible for inherited classes with inherited parameter >field. > >Emmanuel > > > >
