Hmm... I understand this is one of the major differences between a
commercial product - where we put the customer first - and open-source
products - where we develop things for pleasure and thus want to use the
fun stuff as well.. /Tonny

--
Tonny Madsen
My profiles: [image: LinkedIn] <http://www.linkedin.com/in/tonnymadsen> [image:
Twitter] <http://twitter.com/tonnymadsen> [image:
Blogger]<http://tonnymadsen.blogspot.dk/>
 [image: SlideShare] <http://www.slideshare.net/nonty>


On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 10:16 PM, Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]>wrote:

> We obviously want to avoid "alienating significant part of m2e users",
> and this is exactly why I asked the question instead of just making the
> change.
>
> I fully realize some users will not be able to upgrade their java
> version and will have to stay on an older version of m2e. Problem is, we
> don't have any data to judge what proportion of users will and will not
> be able to upgrade because of java version.
>
> Also, I honestly believe that my productivity and productivity of other
> m2e developers and contributors is more important for m2e project than
> costs savings "IT department of a large bank" might get by sticking to
> an old java version.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Igor
>
>
> On 2013-05-30 2:59 PM, Tonny Madsen wrote:
>
>> Igor,
>>
>> You write: "Does anyone have a good reasons to stay with java 6 past
>> this coming
>> June? ("my IT department is too retarded to allow java7" is probably not
>> a good reason)."
>>
>> I don't know if you ever worked in the IT department of a large bank,
>> offshore consultancy company or a similar institution, but... these
>> organizations want to control the amount of support and maintenance by
>> locking down the used platforms. "Retarded"??? I'm pretty sure most IT
>> people would make the same choices given the available resources in the
>> IT departments!
>>
>> Java 7 might make your life easier, but is that really reason enough to
>> alienate an insignificant part of your users?
>>
>> /Tonny
>>
>> --
>> Tonny Madsen
>> My profiles: LinkedIn 
>> <http://www.linkedin.com/in/**tonnymadsen<http://www.linkedin.com/in/tonnymadsen>>
>> Twitter
>> <http://twitter.com/**tonnymadsen <http://twitter.com/tonnymadsen>>
>> Blogger
>> <http://tonnymadsen.blogspot.**dk/ <http://tonnymadsen.blogspot.dk/>>
>> SlideShare
>> <http://www.slideshare.net/**nonty <http://www.slideshare.net/nonty>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 4:10 AM, Igor Fedorenko <[email protected]
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     I'd like to propose moving m2e to require java7 execution environment
>>     after Kepler SR0 is out. I am getting really addicted to
>>     try-with-resources syntax [1], and with java6 past it's eol [2]
>> already,
>>     I see little/no reasons to stick with this version any longer.
>>
>>     Does anyone have a good reasons to stay with java 6 past this coming
>>     June? ("my IT department is too retarded to allow java7" is probably
>> not
>>     a good reason).
>>
>>     [1]
>>     http://docs.oracle.com/javase/**__tutorial/essential/**
>> exceptions/__tryResourceClose.**html<http://docs.oracle.com/javase/__tutorial/essential/exceptions/__tryResourceClose.html>
>>     <http://docs.oracle.com/**javase/tutorial/essential/**
>> exceptions/tryResourceClose.**html<http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/exceptions/tryResourceClose.html>
>> >
>>     [2] 
>> http://www.oracle.com/__**technetwork/java/eol-135779.__**html<http://www.oracle.com/__technetwork/java/eol-135779.__html>
>>
>>     
>> <http://www.oracle.com/**technetwork/java/eol-135779.**html<http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html>
>> >
>>
>>     --
>>     Regards,
>>     Igor
>>     ______________________________**___________________
>>     m2e-users mailing list
>>     [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/__**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/__mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>     
>> <https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> m2e-users mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>>
>>  ______________________________**_________________
> m2e-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://dev.eclipse.org/**mailman/listinfo/m2e-users<https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users>
>
_______________________________________________
m2e-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users

Reply via email to