Exactly my issue. I didn't know if that was something that could be reverse patched into a Juno installation, or if I had to make do with 1.5.1. I had assumed that it was not doable, but thought I would double check just in case there was something that could be done.
Thanks, Eric On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:10 PM, Fred Bricon <[email protected]> wrote: > Apparently no. m2e 1.6 requires a more recent core eclipse component. > Missing requirement: Maven Integration for Eclipse 1.6.2.20150902-0002 > (org.eclipse.m2e.core 1.6.2.20150902-0002) requires 'bundle > org.eclipse.osgi 3.10.0' but it could not be found > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 3:00 PM, Eric B <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Is there any way to shoehorn m2e 1.6 into Juno? I got 1.5 working in >> Juno with the help of the Orbit repository (Orbit-R20140525021250 - >> http://download.eclipse.org/tools/orbit/downloads/drops/R20140525021250/repository/) >> as mentioned on StackOverflow (http://stackoverflow.com/a/24659711/827480 >> ). >> >> Any ideas if there is a similar workaround for 1.6? Upgrading from Juno >> is unfortunately not an option. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Eric >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:56 PM, Fred Bricon <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Both releases saw some performance improvements : >>> https://www.eclipse.org/m2e/documentation/release-notes-15.html >>> https://www.eclipse.org/m2e/documentation/release-notes-16.html >>> >>> Latest version should be the best m2e release ever, until next time. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 2:37 PM, Eric B <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I remember a long while back an email/release note on this list about >>>> speed improvements made in one of the versions of m2e (especially for large >>>> scale projects) after than 1.4. However, I don't remember if it was 1.5 or >>>> 1.6 specifically. >>>> >>>> Can anyone remember? I've got a team using 1.4 on Juno and is >>>> complaining about the amount of time it takes to compile/package/etc. If I >>>> push them onto 1.5 (I have managed to get 1.5 installed on Juno), will that >>>> cut down that amount of time, or was it 1.6 that had the more efficient >>>> algorithms? >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> Eric >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> m2e-users mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>>> from this list, visit >>>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> "Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd >>> And if that fails, then http://goo.gl/tnBgH5 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> m2e-users mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >>> from this list, visit >>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> m2e-users mailing list >> [email protected] >> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe >> from this list, visit >> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users >> > > > > -- > "Have you tried turning it off and on again" - The IT Crowd > And if that fails, then http://goo.gl/tnBgH5 > > _______________________________________________ > m2e-users mailing list > [email protected] > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe > from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users >
_______________________________________________ m2e-users mailing list [email protected] To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/m2e-users
