On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 05:49, Tom Browder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 01:58, Gary V. Vaughan <[email protected]> wrote: ... >> Here is an ealy draft for an article I wrote for `Linux User & Developer'
Gary, I enjoyed the article. I particularly liked the code to show how to avoid the cpp include problem of having to read all included files even with the cpp include guard macros in place. Questions: 1. How close is m4 version 2.0 to being released (I think I saw there are just a few bugs left)? 2. Has there been any interest shown in an extension for gcc to use the m4-cpp? I have a fairly large C++ code base I maintain that I would love to try the m4-cpp on when version 2 is ready. Also, the BRL-CAD project (http://brlcad.org) I keep up with has a huge C and C++ code base that would benefit greatly (as I'm sure many others would, too). Regards, -Tom Thomas M. Browder, Jr. Niceville, Florida USA
