On 17/09/14 14:39, Raphaël Badin wrote: > We want MAAS to be the tool through which you control the power state of > the nodes; that's why we should *flag* deployed nodes that seem to be in > the wrong power state. That being said, I don't think we can rule out > the possibility that a deployed server's power state will be controlled > externally; this is mostly a matter of blending in with existing tooling > and practices.
I agree. A user who owns a node is perfectly within their rights to issue a “shutdown -h” in a shell on that node. If that weren't the case, we wouldn't have had so many concerns over DHCP leases expiring. Jeroen -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~maas-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
