2017-10-31 9:10 GMT+01:00 Mark Shuttleworth <[email protected]>: > On 10/30/2017 10:51 PM, Michael Iatrou wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Андрей Башлаков <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, all! >> > > Hello Andrei! > > >> We have several questions about MaaS roadmap: >> 1) Is there any plans to make role-based user management? Current scheme >> with admins and users is very constrained. We would like to see ability to >> add roles that can, for example, only commission and run test on new >> machines but can’t acquire machines or do anything else; >> > > Yes, we do expect to have RBAC capabilities in future. > > > >> 2) Is there any plans to implement custom hooks for events, such as >> change machine state or discovery new machines? We developing internal >> product that actively using MaaS API and currently we need to run several >> crawlers for detecting such changes. >> > > How often does the state of the machines change? > How large is the pool of the managed machines? > Any reason why the polling approach is not sufficient? > > > Polling won't scale very well :) > > I think the idea of hooks is sensible. It's not on our roadmap, patches or > engineering engagements around that would be welcome. > > Mark > > +1 to the idea of hooks with filters (hostname/ip address/hw features). When something happens (es. machine spawns) we may want to do something like register in inventory systems, subscribe to backup and monitoring, send an email, notice a bot.....
Thank you -- Patrizio Bassi
-- Maas-devel mailing list [email protected] Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/maas-devel
