Hello Mike As I see this, it isn't just about supporting companies who don't make their product(s) accessible. I was just stating possibilities; and using Parallels if you don't want to continually access the interface and adjust your settings, is an option to consider. Parallels is faster; its virtual machines are smaller it would seem, and therefore more efficient to store.
But of course, this is down to user choice entirely. We do have a licensed copy of Fusion, and also Parallels. Although we don't use them very often now because we have hardware solutions for those rare occasions where we need to use Windows. But they do make good test platforms occasionally. So anyway, as I said, it's entirely down to what the individual needs. Lynne On 2 May 2012, at 00:18, Mike Arrigo <n0...@charter.net> wrote: • I would suggest using fusion, even if you could use the virtual machine once it's set up, why support a company that has been told many times about the inaccessibility of their product and refuses to fix it. Fusion does everything parallels does, and it's very accessible. <--- Mac Access At Mac Access Dot Net ---> To reply to this post, please address your message to mac-access@mac-access.net You can find an archive of all messages posted to the Mac-Access forum at either the list's own dedicated web archive: <http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/pipermail/mac-access/index.html> or at the public Mail Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/mac-access@mac-access.net/>. Subscribe to the list's RSS feed from: <http://www.mail-archive.com/mac-access@mac-access.net/maillist.xml> The Mac-Access mailing list is guaranteed malware, spyware, Trojan, virus and worm-free! Please remember to update your membership options periodically by visiting the list website at: <http://mail.tft-bbs.co.uk/mailman/listinfo/mac-access/options/>
