> Date: Sun, 14 Apr 2002 17:44:43 -0400
> From: Mac Duff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

> My sister, a computer user of about five years and reared on 
> Windows, has been taking a web marketing and site design course. 
> She is looking to get a new computer in the near future, and of 
> course, I have been trying to swing her over to the Mac.

In terms of applications for web development, my opinion is that there 
are applications of equal quality available on both platforms.  The 
ability of the Mac to run Windows Apps using Virtual PC is not matched
by any equivalent application on Windows.

In the future, if she were to expand her focus on marketing and 
design to more than just the web (a common thing for web designers 
to do, in my experience), she might find that print houses and the
like are much more easy to work with, since they can be Mac-oriented.
However, if they turn out to be exclusively PC-based, she can do the 
additional work required get it to a PC from a Mac ... the other 
direction is harder.

It's likely that courses for the Windows platform will not translate
well to Mac users, especially online courses (the "problems" that the
Mac users may have been having may have been browser-related!).  But 
the learning curve for a Mac is not that steep, and she already has 
enough Windows experience to be able to readily understand the course 
material, so it doesn't really matter what the other Mac users are
having trouble with.

The bottom line, however, is that an professional web developer will
not have large obstacles to success, whichever platform they prefer.
The Windows systems are significantly cheaper to purchase.  

Consider, though, that a professional *independent* web developer 
will *need* access to at least one Mac system for testing purposes 
anyway.  Sandy McMurray made some excellent points on this topic.
If you have a Windows 2000 machine*** and access to a Mac for 
testing now and then, you can get decent testing on IE6 and a couple 
of Netscape versions for Windows, and basic confirmation on a Mac
browser or two.

(*** the only Windows OS I would recommend for regular use, and it 
*is* a good OS, I use it).

But with a Mac running OSX and Virtual PC, you could have "Guest OS 
installations" that have Windows 98 running IE4, IE5, and IE6, and 
any other browser she can find, not to mention a Linux install or 
seven.  And she can add or discard x86 platforms to that list if she
needs to, she can reinstall one or five of them if they get mucked
up the way Windows can.  Did you know that you *can't* run more than 
one version of IE under Windows?  It's true.  Does she know how to 
set up multiple boots of Windows and Linux on a PC?  I doubt it.

And, if you really want to sell the Mac platform to her, stress 
that *she is your sister*, which means that your own Mac expertise 
will be available in the event that she has any problems on that 
platform.  This may go a long way to alleviating any concerns.

> Yes; I've experienced that. Is that due to some brand of 
> software with which
> the site was written, or is that literally a shortcoming in 
> Mac OS that it
> might not support certain web standards?

Typically, the problems are with the way the site was written.
However, it is often also the case that the Mac user is using 
Netscape 4.x, which, quite frankly, sucks.  A VPC install with
IE6 would allow access to those sites which are otherwise not
usable.

I hope I've given you some insight.

> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 07:34:17 -0700
> From: Steve Kidd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> >incompatibility with Apple's JAVA... Or what... Or just plain bias 
> >on the teacher's part.
> 
> More likely a plain lack of knowledge on the part of the teacher. Not 
> to knock Windows users too much, but generally they're a little 
> narrow-minded - they don't really understand that there are 
> alternatives and they don't look for better ways of doing things.

I would argue this in the general case.  Certainly this mindset is
more common among Windows users, but that's just because Windows
is the mainstream and Mac is not ... if the OSes' positions in the
market were reversed, those users would have been using Mac 
machines all along, and be just as unimaginative.  You can't infer
anything about the user based on their choice of the de facto
standard for their OS.  You *can* infer things about people who
have *not* chosen the de facto standard, however ... good things, 
for the most part.

> 1) Compatibility: There are no compatibility issues. JPEGs, GIFs, 
> HTML files, in fact the majority of file formats, are cross platform. 

This is very true, data exchange in the internetworked world is not a 
problem.  However, see others' comments about web site compatibility.

> 2) Software: All major software titles have always 
> been available for both platforms ... The major design apps are 
> now available for OSeX as well 

Certainly, there is no shortage of quality software for designers on
the Mac platform.  Definitely at least equal to that on Windows.

> 3) Stability - ... [MSCE techs warn that XP has]
> compatibility problems with external devices. (Their choice, BTW, in 
> case  your sis does go to the dark side, is 2000 or NT)

Definitely Windows 2000.  Currently, it's the only choice.

> OTOH, I don't crash more than once a week, if that, in OS 9, and OSeX 
> is incredibly stable. It's near impossible to crash the system.

I crash much much less than that using Windows 2000.  But yes, Mac
OSX is reputed to be highly stable as well.

> Forgot one important point - Quality.
> 
> In my experience with PCs, the only ones that matches Apple quality 
> are the Dells. They seem to have equivalent levels of compatibility 
> and quailty control.

Mac machines are generally of higher quality than the average PC 
system, and the consistency of hardware is a great advantage from a 
support standpoint.

I've said for a while when discussing these topics with friends that 
the Mac is a premium PC (in the original meaning of the word PC).  I 
regard the hardware and OS as being a step above that which is 
available under Windows.  But it's like buying a higher-quality car: 
it will be more fun to drive, easier to maintain, safer ... and much 
more expensive.  There's a good reason why cheaper cars are popular.

> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 11:41:23 -0300
> From: John Christie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> I have to agree on the ignorance issue and would like to point out 
> an anomalie.  PC tech support, not tier 1 grunts, but tier 2 people, 
> contains an above average proportion of Mac and Windows folks.  
> People who know computing and know about alternatives to Windows 
> don't use Windows.  It is rare that they will say they prefer it.

This has not been my experience, after working in multi-platform
environments for 4 years.  Almost without exception, the people that
I consider knowledgable in the way you describe above are using 
Windows *and* some other platform(s).  A number of them prefer 
Windows, but they still use Linux, for example, because of the 
appropriateness of the platform for certain situations.  I don't own
a Mac myself, although my daughter uses a Mac Classic.  I would use
a Mac if I were doing web design professionally.

> Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2002 08:09:09 -0700
> From: Amber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 
> Yes, still narrow minded. In these days and times, professionals 
> in web design and similar areas should be familiar with both Mac 
> and PC.

With this last point I concur.  Mac Duff, this is another vote in 
favour of your sister gaining Mac experience, if not buying a Mac 
outright.  Linux should not be ignored, either, but I would focus
on Macs first.

Zac

-- 
Mac Canada is sponsored by <http://lowendmac.com/> and...

Shop Canadian, visit Mantek Services          <http://www.mantek.mb.ca>
       Low Prices That Will Keep YOU and Your MAC Smiling

      Support Low End Mac <http://lowendmac.com/lists/support.html>

Mac Canada info:        <http://lowendmac.com/lists/mac-can.shtml>
Send list messages to:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To unsubscribe, email:  <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For digest mode, email: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subscription questions: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Archive: <http://www.mail-archive.com/mac-canada%40mail.maclaunch.com/>

Using a Mac? Free email & more at Applelinks! http://www.applelinks.com

Reply via email to