eric b a écrit : Eric,
Can you read my opening sub-phrase to Clytie :
I shouldn't worry too much
Clytie and I are qa'ers, and I am not a hard coder (I can't speak for Clytie). Speaking for myself, I do not read each and every single mail that floats by on this list, nor do I have the time to follow the developers' blogs. I was just confirming Clytie's remarks as to whether the behaviour appeared to be general instability with the product. If now, we are expected to follow each and every CWS that goes into the product, and accompanying message, well quite frankly I can spend my time better elsewhere, or am I to understand that volunteers are only welcome if they can read various forms of programming language and know how each of the individual modules works ? If I limit my remarks to the qa list, will they go unnoticed ? More than likely yes, since apart from the devs themselves, we are the ones providing feedback for the Mac product, and most of the mac devs, don't AFAIK (I'm willing to stand corrected), frequent the general qa list.
What good is it to me as a tester to know that CWS xyz is being integrated in mXX, when all that is available on the servers is m21 ? The announcement for m21 only came out yesterday or the day before, hardly old hat is it ?
Whatever, forget it, I'm outta here. Alex --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
